![]() |
||
|
Inside the Brown line
POSTED:Wed, November 19, 2008 @ 9:04AM
The Maid of OrleansSo I did a little research. Turns out we were both wrong, but I was wronger. Nobody called Joan crazy until the 20th century, when people started to look for ways to explain her visions, visions that were taken as a a real manifestation of the divine by most people before our skeptical, secular age. And most of the diagnoses proposed don’t sound very plausible. She would’ve had trouble leading armies into battle with tuberculosis, and schizophrenia seems equally unlikely given how well she dealt with the people around her and gained so much support, and the rational mind her trial transcripts show. But, as I said, nobody called her crazy until the 20th century. It wasn’t misogyny. It was scholars in the 20th century assuming that there’s no such thing as God talking to people so it must be something else. She faced plenty of misogynistic prejudice at the time — the technical legal reason for her execution was that she violated Biblical law by wearing men’s clothes — but the crazy thing isn’t that. Edit: I just put a bit more thought into it, and here is my unscientific, unfounded explanation. People interpret things through the lenses of their beliefs and preconceptions. If you believe a house is haunted, you think every shadow, creak and bump in the night is a ghost. If you believe in aliens, every weird-looking star is a UFO. And if you believe God has a real, physical presence in your life, then you’re likely to interpret every dream, every coincidence, every odd daydream as a sign from Him. Joan lived in an era where people believed God directly communicated with people like that. She wouldn’t have to be crazy to think God was talking to her.
Share:
|
Nathan Brown![]() Staff Writer
Contact Info
518-891-2600 x26
My Favorite Sites
Jacob Resneck's
Recent Blogs
» Hangover helper |